|
|
|
|
![]() |
God's Election Throughout ScripturePeople debating predestination frequently fail to consider God has already done considerable "electing" throughout the Bible, and in their own daily lives. They tend to ignore the fact that as owner-creator God has the absolute right to do whatever he wants with whoever he wants however he wants and any time he wants to accomplish anything he wants. God regularly places people when and where he chooses, and everyone accepts this ("Hey, that's life!") and simply lives with the consequences without much thought about it. Let's look at some choices God made without our consent and without any anticipated decision on our part. He is the irresistible force--there are no immovable objects!God Elects Abraham and Ignores the Rest
From among all the people on the earth, God chose Abram. God elected not to choose anyone else. Had Abram done anything to deserve this honor? No. Abram most likely was serving Nana the Moon-god--like his father before him. Yet, God selected Abram for particular blessings to the total exclusion of everyone else. Arminians might argue God choose Abram because he foreknew Abram would accept him. But was Abram was the only man on earth who would do so? What would have happened to God's big plan had Abram said, "No, thanks"? Would God have settled for second choice? Would he have gone done a list of potential candidates until he found someone willing to work with an unseen God? Hardly. That's not the picture Scripture paints of the creator and controller of the universe. God chose Abraham, and ignored everyone else solely because it pleased him to do so. Several specific things should be noted about God's election of Abram:
God Elects Jacob over Esau
Here's another undisputable election God made totally independent of human action, will, or merit. Esau was the first-born--legally entitled to both the birthright and blessing. But even before his birth--before either man had done good or bad--God elected the older to serve the younger. "Esau have I hated." If unconditional election is not true, what could this possibly mean? God rejected Esau and chose Jacob not because one was any better than the other (Jacob's life proved that), and not because of anything either would eventually do, but solely because it pleased God to do so.
God Elects One Nation and Ignores All The Rest
The purpose of electing Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was, of course, to create Israel--God's chosen nation. Only by God's mercy were they elected to their position of blessing to the total exclusion of "all the [other] families of the earth." The fact that they were selected apart from any goodness on their part is embarrassingly obvious, but has been their continual source of security--their election has never depended upon their own worthiness!
Throughout the Old Testament the Lord reaffirmed this election of Israel over other nations in spite of willful and defiant disobedience. In fact, Israel was in rebellion to God throughout most of the Old Testament! Israel is portrayed as the unfaithful wife who prostituted herself in Hosea. But, not only did God continually reaffirm his election and reiterate his promised blessings to Israel throughout Scripture, but he flatly states he shall save them, they shall be his people, and he shall be their God:
Just as with Abram (Abraham) his "I will"'s concerning Israel are stated unconditionally. Israel was honored with this divine choice in sharp contrast with the treatment accorded every other nation on earth. Israel was predestined, as the seed of Abraham, to be recipient of God's blessings, and as the Old Testament clearly demonstrates--this choice rested solely on the unmerited love of God, and had absolutely nothing to do with Israel's foreknown performance or "accepting" God's sovereign choice--which was on-again/off-again at best! God Elects Some Nations for Honor, but Others for DishonorBeyond electing Israel to a special place of prominence and blessing, and besides promising to implant in them a new spiritual heart and make them his holy people, it is also obvious that God has elected certain nations either to specific temporal blessings, or to be instruments to be used however God sees fit. The time each government rises to power, the extent of it's authority, it's national boundaries, and even the length of it's existence have all been foreordained by the creator who controls the future and works "all things" to the good of his elect.
God uses each nation as he chooses in order to accomplish whatever purpose he sets.
The Bible is emphatic that Amenhotep II's Egyptian government rose to power specifically so God could demonstrate his power by breaking it's back and releasing the Children of Israel from slavery--"I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go." (Exodus 4:21). Although the Bible tells us that Pharaoh willfully resisted Moses (and therefore God), it's equally straight-forward in it's statement that God was instrumental in causing Pharaoh to resist Moses--thereby incurring the wrath and punishment of God--because this was God's plan from the beginning!
Joshua tells us when the children of Israel entered the Promised Land they had to fight the existing inhabitants. God had already foretold they must utterly destroy them. The Lord intended these inhabitants to resist for the very reason that Israel could destroy them from the land. Was it unfair of God to kill off these men, women, and children? Who created the land? Who created the people? The Babylonian and Assyrian empires did not accidentally rise to world power, but did so at the time and in the manner planned beforehand by God. He used them to discipline his elect nation. When they had accomplished their intended purpose they were discarded. History books are filled with nations God has used and discarded. Since many are predicted by God beforehand how could anyone actually doubt that God directed the activities of these nations to accomplish his predictions? By extension, how could anyone doubt that God directed the thoughts and decisions of key individuals within these nations to fulfill his predictions?
In recent history Hitler's Third Reich served the same purpose as Egypt, Babylon, and Assyria. Hitler's persecution and attempted extermination of the Jews focused world attention on their plight and caused such an outcry that the nation of Israel was reborn in their Promised Land after 1900 years--in partial fulfillment of Ezekiel's prophecy of the dry bones. Now, Hitler's dead, the Third Reich's gone, but Israel remains as promised to Abraham. Should there be any doubt about the long-term fate of any government attacking Israel today? But, here's another consideration regarding national election:
Have Arminians seriously considered the ramification of this verse? Paul was well on his way to Asia to spread the "good news" to the millions of people there in obedience to Jesus' command to go into all the world. But God specifically forbade Paul to share the salvation message with these people! Instead, he was shown a vision of a man calling him to Macedonia. So, Paul went to Europe instead of Asia. By God's sovereign election, Europe was given the Gospel and that salvation was withheld from Asia! Millions (if not billions) of souls in Asia and the Orient have died in Spiritual darkness--going to hell never hearing the "good news" because God elected Europe over Asia. Western Civilization not only received the Gospel, but embraced the Judeo-Christian philosophy, ethics, and body of justice. It's not an accident that the United States of America developed into the richest, most powerful, and most industrialized nation in the world while Asia--in general--remains generally poor, agrarian, and dictatorial. How different our world would be had God elected Asia as Paul's missionary field instead! Can anyone claim God has not deliberately chosen to bless the "West" in multiple ways? Would someone be foolish enough to claim God chose Europe over Asia because he foreknew Europe would "accept" him but Asia would not? Hopefully, not. Europe got the Gospel--and Asians ignorantly went to hell--because that's the way God planned it. Our founding fathers called this "Divine Providence"--God chose... and (of course) that's the way it happened! That is not to say that billions of people haven't individually made trillions of decisions to move history along to the point where we are today--it's just that knowingly or unknowingly all those decisions conformed to God's predetermined plan because God controls His-story. And just like we can't point to any special worth in Israel that influenced God's decision to select him instead of Egypt or Assyria, we certainly cannot present a credible defense why God should bless America so richly in rights, privileges, material and spiritual blessings over any other country while children in South America, Africa, India, and other nations starve to death. We are the beneficiaries of God's grace although we did absolutely nothing to deserve these blessings. God Elects Some Individuals to Special Blessing from BirthWhich brings up another type of election--that of individuals receiving the grace by which they can hear or read the Gospel, associate with believers, and generally share in the benefits of living in a civilization where the Gospel has greatly influenced the laws, common understandings, and society. Have you ever wondered why you were born here, and now? What might have been different had you been born to different parents living somewhere else--in another place and time? None of us were able to choose our parents! Who determined whether you were born in Tucson or Tibet? 1952, or 1592? Who determined whether your parents were God-fearing believers who loved you and trained you in Spiritual things, or irresponsible parents who considered you an inconvenience to be aborted and dumped in the trash? Who determined whether you were born to status, health, wealth, and privilege, or whether you were destitute, deformed, and hungry? Either you must accept that these events were determined by the "luck of the draw," or acknowledge that all of these things were sovereignty decided for you beforehand--by your creator. All these variables that determine your very being were predestined by God. C. H. Spurgeon says it this way,
Surely no one would insist that a Kennedy or Rockefeller baby has so much more personal merit that he actually deserves being born to the status and privilege he will surely become accustomed! Likewise, no one admits to being such a loser they actually deserve a drunken father to beat him. We don't receive what we get based on merit, personal worth, or God simply foreknowing someone would be better off living in a mud hut along the Amazon River worshiping a wooden stick. It is only by God's choice that I was born in America of Christian parents who loved me, and taught me to fear and worship the God of the Bible. God Elects Some Individuals To Receive Particular Gifts While Passing Over Others
God also reserves the exclusive right to make choices and distinctions in the distribution of Spiritual gifts within the church (and God does not distribute spiritual gifts outside the church at all). Few are apostles. Not everyone speaks with tongues or interprets. A few work miracles, some teach, some shepherd the flock. But no one chooses these Spiritual gifts for themselfes--the Holy Spirit distributes spiritual gifts as He wills. Human endeavor, desire, or personal merit do not determine who receives any spiritual gift. God's foreknowledge of who will do the best job is not a determining factor. God distributes Spiritual gifts based solely upon his own pleasure and purpose! He didn't pick Billy Graham (you can insert any name you highly esteem) and pass over you because you weren't as good as Billy, weren't as worthy, didn't have as much faith, didn't pray as hard, speak as well, or because he foreknew Billy would win more souls than you ever could. God elected Billy Graham to be an evangelist solely because it pleased him to do so--then he made Billy Graham willing to exercise that gift, and placed him in situations where he could. The identical logic can be applied to non-Spiritual gifts as well--vocations, talents, and other special abilities. "Perfect pitch" is a musical gift that less than one in a thousand have--one either has it or hasn't; it can't be learned. Others can't carry a tune in a bucket with both hands--they literally cannot distinguish tone or pitch. Gifts that enable one person and not another to be an excellent musician, artisan, doctor or lawyer are distributed by God based solely upon his will and purpose. How about gifts of personal beauty, intelligence, disposition and personality. How about body shapes and sizes? Why do some people have greater capacity for compassion and empathy while others struggle with a propensity toward addiction or homosexuality? All of us have to work with whatever God's given us, but it's plain that some are born with considerably more in particular areas than others. No one would attribute any of these differences to varying degrees of personal worth, or God's foreknowledge of what a person might accomplish with his beauty, brains, talent, or money. Again, it has to be either fate, "luck of the draw", or God's choice. God Elects Some Individuals to Eternal SalvationArminians have little difficulty acknowledging that God has sovereign control over who gets these Spiritual and non-spiritual gifts--they allow God to distribute these blessings however he sees fit. They also don't have much problem with God choosing Abraham for special blessing while ignoring everyone else. It's also ok for God to to raise up Pharaoh and smack him down again (although they tend to emphasize the part about Pharaoh hardening his heart and ignore many verses in which God says (beforehand) that he will harden Pharaoh's heart). Actually, all the examples of God's sovereign election I've provided so far are generally acceptable to Arminians. However, in discussing this last kind of election--eternal salvation--they want to remove control from the Creator's hands and place it firmly in their own hands. Yet all these forms of election are essentially the same in principle. In each instance God gives what he wants to whoever he wants--and withholds it from all the rest! He does this with no accountability to anyone else, and without requiring the cooperation or assistance from anyone to fully complete his plan. Personal experience, and the everyday world around us, reveals that God bestows various blessings upon some--but not all--irrespective of (and frequently in spite of) any worth or goodness on their part. The most gifted scientists and philosophers seem to deny God even exists. Many truly gifted musicians become hedonistic rock stars. Beautiful people flaunt their sins on TV and in movies for fun and profit. Nations who have benefited much from God's blessings have turned their back on God. It follows logically that this same principal must hold true for God's choice of who he adopts into his family.
As previously stated, Arminians maintain that God's predestination is based upon his foreknowledge of an individual's prior choice. However, Christ explicitly told his disciples, "You have not chosen me--I chose you," thereby indicating God’s choice to be first and primary while man’s choice results from God's prior choice. God didn't choose us because we were worthy but in spite of the fact that we were unworthy. He didn't choose us because he foreknew we would choose him; we chose him because he fore-chose us--"before the foundations of the world." With man's God-hating, rebellious, sinful nature it couldn't have ever happen any other way.
|
![]() | ||||||||
|
Who We Are Service Times
|
||||||||